''' idéIdé-eolaíocht pholaitiúil, shóisialta agus eacnamaíoch is ea '''an Daonlathas sóisialta''' , atá i bhfabhar dirghabháil[[idirghabháil rialtais ]] le haghaidh [[Ceartas sóisialta|ceartais shóisialta ]] a chur chun cinn , i gcomhthéacs an pholaití iobrálaigh[[Daonlathas liobrálach|liobrálaigh dhaonlathaigh ]] agus an gheilleagair [[Caipitleachas|chaipitlíoch ]], chomh maith le réimeas beartais a bhaineann le tiomantas don [[daonlathas ionadaíoch|dhaonlathas ionadaíoch ]] agus [[daonlathas rannpháirtíochta|rannpháirtíoch ]], bearta maidir le [[Athdháileadh ioncaim agus saibhreas|hathdháileadh ioncaim ]] agus rialáil an gheilleagair ar mhaithe leis an [[leas ginearáltacoiteann]] agus an [[stát leasa ]]. {{sfn|Heywood|2012|p=128|ps=: "Social democracy is an ideological stance that supports a broad balance between market capitalism, on the one hand, and state intervention, on the other hand. Being based on a compromise between the market and the state, social democracy lacks a systematic underlying theory and is, arguably, inherently vague. It is nevertheless associated with the following views: (1) capitalism is the only reliable means of generating wealth, but it is a morally defective means of distributing wealth because of its tendency towards poverty and inequality; (2) the defects of the capitalist system can be rectified through economic and social intervention, the state being the custodian of the public interest […]"}}<ref>{{harvnb|Miller|1998|p=827}}: "The idea of social democracy is now used to describe a society the economy of which is predominantly capitalist, but where the state acts to regulate the economy in the general interest, provides welfare services outside of it and attempts to alter the distribution of income and wealth in the name of social justice."</ref>{{sfn|Badie|Berg-Schlosser|Morlino|2011|p=2423|ps=: "Social democracy refers to a political tendency resting on three fundamental features: (1) democracy (e.g., equal rights to vote and form parties), (2) an economy partly regulated by the state (e.g., through Keynesianism), and (3) a welfare state offering social support to those in need (e.g., equal rights to education, health service, employment and pensions)."}} Ar an gcaoi sin, tá sé mar aidhm ag an dhaonlathas sóisialta na coinníollacha a chruthú le haghaidh an chaipitleachais ionas go bhféadfadh go mbeadh níos mó torthaí daonlathacha, [[cothromaíochas|cothromaíocha ]], coitianta agus [[dlúthpháirtíocht|dlúthpháirtíochta ]]; agus is minic a shamhlaítear é leis an tsraith de beartais shocheacnamaíocha a tháinig chun chinn i dtuaisceart agus in Iarthar na hÉeorpa—go háirithe an tSamhail Nordach sna [[Na Stáit Nordacha|tíortha Nordacha]]—i rith an dara leath den 20ú haois.{{sfn|Weisskopf|1992|p=10|ps=: "Thus social democrats do not try to do away with either the market or private property ownership; instead, they attempt to create conditions in which the operation of a capitalist market economy will lead to more egalitarian outcomes and encourage more democratic and more solidaristic practices than would a more conventional capitalist system."}}{{sfnm|1a1=Gombert|1a2=Bläsius|1a3=Krell|1a4=Timpe|1y=2009|1p=8|2a1=Sejersted|2y=2011}} ▼{{Use British (Oxford) English|date=January 2014}}
▲''' idé-eolaíocht pholaitiúil, shóisialta agus eacnamaíoch is ea Daonlathas sóisialta''' atá i bhfabhar dirghabháil rialtais le haghaidh ceartais shóisialta a chur chun cinn i gcomhthéacs an pholaití iobrálaigh dhaonlathaigh agus an gheilleagair chaipitlíoch , chomh maith le réimeas beartais a bhaineann le tiomantas don dhaonlathas ionadaíoch agus rannpháirtíoch, bearta maidir le hathdháileadh ioncaim agus rialáil an gheilleagair ar mhaithe leis an leas ginearálta agus an stát leasa. {{sfn|Heywood|2012|p=128|ps=: "Social democracy is an ideological stance that supports a broad balance between market capitalism, on the one hand, and state intervention, on the other hand. Being based on a compromise between the market and the state, social democracy lacks a systematic underlying theory and is, arguably, inherently vague. It is nevertheless associated with the following views: (1) capitalism is the only reliable means of generating wealth, but it is a morally defective means of distributing wealth because of its tendency towards poverty and inequality; (2) the defects of the capitalist system can be rectified through economic and social intervention, the state being the custodian of the public interest […]"}}<ref>{{harvnb|Miller|1998|p=827}}: "The idea of social democracy is now used to describe a society the economy of which is predominantly capitalist, but where the state acts to regulate the economy in the general interest, provides welfare services outside of it and attempts to alter the distribution of income and wealth in the name of social justice."</ref>{{sfn|Badie|Berg-Schlosser|Morlino|2011|p=2423|ps=: "Social democracy refers to a political tendency resting on three fundamental features: (1) democracy (e.g., equal rights to vote and form parties), (2) an economy partly regulated by the state (e.g., through Keynesianism), and (3) a welfare state offering social support to those in need (e.g., equal rights to education, health service, employment and pensions)."}} Ar an gcaoi sin, tá sé mar aidhm ag an dhaonlathas sóisialta na coinníollacha a chruthú le haghaidh an chaipitleachais ionas go bhféadfadh go mbeadh níos mó torthaí daonlathacha, cothromaíocha, coitianta agus dlúthpháirtíochta; agus is minic a shamhlaítear é leis an tsraith de beartais shocheacnamaíocha a tháinig chun chinn i dtuaisceart agus in Iarthar na hÉeorpa—go háirithe an tSamhail Nordach sna [[Na Stáit Nordacha|tíortha Nordacha]]—i rith an dara leath den 20ú haois.{{sfn|Weisskopf|1992|p=10|ps=: "Thus social democrats do not try to do away with either the market or private property ownership; instead, they attempt to create conditions in which the operation of a capitalist market economy will lead to more egalitarian outcomes and encourage more democratic and more solidaristic practices than would a more conventional capitalist system."}}{{sfnm|1a1=Gombert|1a2=Bläsius|1a3=Krell|1a4=Timpe|1y=2009|1p=8|2a1=Sejersted|2y=2011}}
==Tagairtí==
Daonlathas sóisialta a tháinig mar polaitiúil idé-eolaíocht go bhfuil molta éabhlóideach agus aistriú síochánta ó capitalism go [[sóisialachas]] ag baint úsáide as a bunaíodh próisis pholaitiúla i gcodarsnacht leis an cur chuige réabhlóideach chun an t-aistriú a bhaineann le orthodox Marxism.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.britannica.com/topic/social-democracy|title=Social democracy|publisher=''Encyclopædia Britannica''|accessdate=10 August 2015}}</ref> I dtús an chogaidh a ré in Iarthar na Heorpa, daonlathach sóisialta páirtithe dhiúltaigh an Stalin polaitiúil agus eacnamaíoch múnla reatha san Aontas Sóivéadach, a cion féin ceachtar a cosán malartach a sóisialachas nó ar chomhréiteach idir capitalism agus sóisialachas.{{sfn|Adams|1993|pp=102-103|ps=: "The emergence of social democracy was partly a result of the Cold War. People argued that if the Stalinist Soviet empire, where the state controlled everything, showed socialism in action, then socialism was not worth having. [...] The consensus policies of a mixed and managed economy and the welfare state, developed by the post-war Labour government, seemed in themselves to provide a basis for a viable socialism that would combine prosperity and freedom with social justice and the possibility of a full life for everyone. They could be seen as a compromise between socialism and capitalism."}} Sa tréimhse seo, an páirtí daonlathach sóisialta glactha measctha le geilleagar bunaithe ar an barrachas de mhaoin phríobháideach, a bhfuil ach mionlach riachtanach fóntais agus seirbhísí poiblí faoi úinéireacht phoiblí. Mar thoradh air sin, an daonlathas sóisialta a bhí a bhaineann leis an eacnamaíocht Keynesian, stáit interventionism agus an stát leasa shóisialaigh, agus a thréigean roimh an sprioc a chur in ionad an chóras caipitleach (fachtóir margaí, maoin phríobháideach agus saothair pá){{sfn|Weisskopf|1992|p=10|ps=: "Thus social democrats do not try to do away with either the market or private property ownership; instead, they attempt to create conditions in which the operation of a capitalist market economy will lead to more egalitarian outcomes and encourage more democratic and more solidaristic practices than would a more conventional capitalist system."}} le cháilíochtúil éagsúla sóisialach córas eacnamaíochta.<ref>{{harvnb|Miller|1998|p=827}}: "In the second, mainly post-war, phase, social democrats came to believe that their ideals and values could be achieved by reforming capitalism rather than abolishing it. They favored a mixed economy in which most industries would be privately owned, with only a small number of utilities and other essential services in public ownership."</ref>{{sfn|Jones|2001|p=1410|ps=: "In addition, particularly since World War II, distinctions have sometimes been made between social democrats and socialists on the basis that the former have accepted the permanence of the mixed economy and have abandoned the idea of replacing the capitalist system with a qualitatively different socialist society."}}{{sfn|Heywood|2012|pp=125–128|ps=: "As an ideological stance, social democracy took shape around the mid-twentieth century, resulting from the tendency among western socialist parties not only to adopt parliamentary strategies, but also to revise their socialist goals. In particular, they abandoned the goal of abolishing capitalism and sought instead to reform or ‘humanize’ it. Social democracy therefore came to stand for a broad balance between the market economy, on the one hand, and state intervention, on the other."}}
== Nótaí ==
|
