Leagan ó 20:35, 23 Aibreán 2020 athraigh Marcas.oduinn (plé \| dréachtaí) Confirmed users 30,699 edits →‎Teaghlach: ... ag aistriú clib: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit ← Gabh chuig an difear roimhe seo		Leagan ó 22:40, 23 Aibreán 2020 athraigh cealaigh Marcas.oduinn (plé \| dréachtaí) Confirmed users 30,699 edits →‎Stair: ... ag aistriú clib: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit An chéad dhifear eile →
Líne 8: ==Stair== Deirtear gur éirigh Ailill ina Ard-Rí tar éis bhás osnádúrtha [[Lóegaire mac Néill\|Laoghaire mhic Néill]], is dócha c. 463. Glacadh go forleathan i bhfoinsí ar son Uí Néill gurbh Ard-Rí é Ailill, agus dá bharr, creidtear gur sin mar a bhí. ''The broad agreement of generally pro-Uí Néill sources that Ailill was High King is offered as proof that this was the case. Although the chronology of 5th century High Kings has been the subject of manipulation, it is seen as unlikely that later historians and genealogists would have added a non-Uí Néill king had the belief that Ailill was king not been widespread. Ailill is said to have become High King following the supernatural death of [[Lóegaire mac Néill\|Laoghaire mac Néill]], supposedly c. 463. The [[Annála na hÉireann]] contain many references to him, but most of these are taken to be late additions, or come from the now lost ''[[Lebor Cuanu]]'', extracts of which are preserved in the ''[[Annála Uladh]]''. Tradition has him killed in battle at [[Faughan Hill]], fighting against the sons of Niall. The king lists say that he was succeeded by [[Lugaid mac Lóegairi\|Lughaidh mac Laoghaire]]. Feictear a lán luanna dó i n-[[annála na hÉireann]], ach creidtear gur cuireadh iad iontu níos dearanaí, nó gur as ''[[Lebor Cuanu]]'' anois caillte a tógadh iad<!--, extracts of which are preserved in the ''[[Annála Uladh]]''-->. Instear sna scéalta gur mharaiodh é i rith catha ag [[Faughanhill]], ag tríd in éadan mhic Uí Néill. De réir liostaí na ríthe, tháinig [[Lugaid mac Lóegairi\|Lughaidh mac Laoghaire]] i gcomharbacht air. ''Opposing the view that Ailill was included as a High King from the earliest times, [[Thomas Charles-Edwards]] suggests that the inclusion of Nath Í and Ailill Molt was a means to reinforce links between the Uí Néill and the other branches of the Connachta in the late 7th or 8th centuries, when he presumes the king lists and the annals related to [[Naomh Pádraig]] to have been collected and edited. This without giving undue support to any contemporary claims by the other Connachta kindreds, the Uí Ailello and, in particular, the powerful Uí Briúin, to the High Kingship.▼ ▲''Opposing the view that Ailill was included as a High King from the earliest times, [[Thomas Charles-Edwards]] suggests that the inclusion of Nath Í ~~and~~agus Ailill Molt was a means to reinforce links between the Uí Néill and the other branches of the Connachta in the late 7th or 8th centuries, when he presumes the king lists and the annals related to [[Naomh Pádraig]] to have been collected and edited. This without giving undue support to any contemporary claims by the other Connachta kindreds, the Uí Ailello and, in particular, the powerful Uí Briúin, to the High Kingship. ==Foinsí==

An difríocht idir athruithe ar: "Ailill Molt"