Plé:Iúil Caesar
Alt maith, ach tá gá le tagairtí. Tá an téacs caighdeánaithe agam agus liosta saothar curtha leis.
Colin Ryan 04:42, 5 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
- Tá an téacs caighdeánaithe agam - Means, you have again needlessly tinkered with perfectly good and idiomatic Irish and introduced pidginesque and unnatural language. I don't use non-Caighdeán language when I write in the Wikipedia, I always use both Ó Dónaill and Focal.ie when I write. You know, this is not the first time you destroy my work by introducing unidiomatic Irish. And your suggestions about standardizing the language ring somewhat hollow when there are obvious misprints ("chonnaic" for "chonaic", say), which you have left untouched. The place is littered with horribly bad Irish, but somehow you seem to feel that dumbing down my Irish is much more important than improving those articles which are written in entirely bad Irish. I don't tinker with your Irish, you know, and you know perfectly well that you are in no position to improve on mine. Remember the alkaloid controversy? Back then it turned out that you had absolutely no idea of chemistry and what the original text was saying, and you did not even check the terminology (using "dúshraith" for "base" in the chemical sense!), but still you somehow felt it was appropriate of you to tinker with my work. Frankly, I have a hard time recognizing you as a bona fide contributor, and people like you make me ask myself, why I bother at all.Panu Petteri Höglund 09:15, 13 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
- A Phainu, a chara, An bhfuil athruithe an Rianaigh comh dona sin? D'aontóinn leat go mbeadh sé níos tairbhe dó ailt scríofa i ndroch-Ghaeilge a chur ina gceart.Éóg1916 10:13, 14 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)
- Tá an téacs caighdeánaithe agam - Means, you have again needlessly tinkered with perfectly good and idiomatic Irish and introduced pidginesque and unnatural language. I don't use non-Caighdeán language when I write in the Wikipedia, I always use both Ó Dónaill and Focal.ie when I write. You know, this is not the first time you destroy my work by introducing unidiomatic Irish. And your suggestions about standardizing the language ring somewhat hollow when there are obvious misprints ("chonnaic" for "chonaic", say), which you have left untouched. The place is littered with horribly bad Irish, but somehow you seem to feel that dumbing down my Irish is much more important than improving those articles which are written in entirely bad Irish. I don't tinker with your Irish, you know, and you know perfectly well that you are in no position to improve on mine. Remember the alkaloid controversy? Back then it turned out that you had absolutely no idea of chemistry and what the original text was saying, and you did not even check the terminology (using "dúshraith" for "base" in the chemical sense!), but still you somehow felt it was appropriate of you to tinker with my work. Frankly, I have a hard time recognizing you as a bona fide contributor, and people like you make me ask myself, why I bother at all.Panu Petteri Höglund 09:15, 13 Mí na Samhna 2009 (UTC)