An difríocht idir athruithe ar: "Ailill Molt"
Content deleted Content added
→Foinsí: ...ag eagrú |
... ag aistriú go gaeilge |
||
Líne 1:
{{Glanadh-mar|ag asitríú go Gaeilge}}
==
''Ailill was said to be the son of [[Nath Í mac Fiachrach|Nath Í]]
''Although Ailill's descendants are not reckoned High Kings of Ireland, his grandson [[Eógan Bél|Eoghan Béal]] and great-grandson [[Ailill Inbanda]] are counted as Kings of Connacht. Ailill's son Mac Ercae may have been an important historical figure, but the record conflates Mac Ercae mac Ailello Muilt and the Uí Néill king [[Muirchertach mac Muiredaig]], called Muirchertach Mac Ercae, probably confusing events beyond recovery.
==
''The broad agreement of generally pro-Uí Néill sources that Ailill was High King is offered as proof that this was the case. Although the chronology of 5th century High Kings has been the subject of manipulation, it is seen as unlikely that later historians and genealogists would have added a non-Uí Néill king had the belief that Ailill was king not been widespread. Ailill is said to have become High King following the supernatural death of [[Lóegaire mac Néill|Laoghaire mac Néill]], supposedly c. 463. The [[
''Opposing the view that Ailill was included as a High King from the earliest times, [[Thomas Charles-Edwards]] suggests that the inclusion of Nath Í and Ailill Molt was a means to reinforce links between the Uí Néill and the other branches of the Connachta in the late 7th or 8th centuries, when he presumes the king lists and the annals related to [[
==Foinsí==
|